Next | Query returned 34 messages, browsing 11 to 20 | Previous

History of commit frequency

CVS Commit History:


   2009-07-09 11:19:03 by Matthias Scheler | Files touched by this commit (1)
Log message:
Add "lib" to the list of installation directories.
   2009-07-08 01:14:12 by Havard Eidnes | Files touched by this commit (1)
Log message:
Minor adjustments for this package:

 o Ensure that the include/ directory exists before installing into it
   (uncovered during bulk build, causing include to be a file, and
   causing cascading build problems for all subsequent packages
   wanting to install include files...)
 o Do some other minor adjustments to placate pkglint.
   2009-06-14 20:05:51 by Joerg Sonnenberger | Files touched by this commit (88)
Log message:
Remove @dirrm entries from PLISTs
   2009-03-20 20:25:55 by Joerg Sonnenberger | Files touched by this commit (1252)
Log message:
Simply and speed up buildlink3.mk files and processing.
This changes the buildlink3.mk files to use an include guard for the
recursive include. The use of BUILDLINK_DEPTH, BUILDLINK_DEPENDS,
BUILDLINK_PACKAGES and BUILDLINK_ORDER is handled by a single new
variable BUILDLINK_TREE. Each buildlink3.mk file adds a pair of
enter/exit marker, which can be used to reconstruct the tree and
to determine first level includes. Avoiding := for large variables
(BUILDLINK_ORDER) speeds up parse time as += has linear complexity.
The include guard reduces system time by avoiding reading files over and
over again. For complex packages this reduces both %user and %sys time to
half of the former time.
   2007-02-19 22:38:33 by Joerg Sonnenberger | Files touched by this commit (1)
Log message:
Modular Xorg support.
   2006-07-09 01:11:17 by Johnny C. Lam | Files touched by this commit (877)
Log message:
Change the format of BUILDLINK_ORDER to contain depth information as well,
and add a new helper target and script, "show-buildlink3", that outputs
a listing of the buildlink3.mk files included as well as the depth at
which they are included.

For example, "make show-buildlink3" in fonts/Xft2 displays:

	zlib
	fontconfig
	    iconv
	    zlib
	    freetype2
	    expat
	freetype2
	Xrender
	    renderproto
   2006-07-09 00:39:49 by Johnny C. Lam | Files touched by this commit (877)
Log message:
Track information in a new variable BUILDLINK_ORDER that informs us
of the order in which buildlink3.mk files are (recursively) included
by a package Makefile.
   2006-04-12 12:27:47 by Roland Illig | Files touched by this commit (749)
Log message:
Aligned the last line of the buildlink3.mk files with the first line, so
that they look nicer.
   2006-04-06 08:23:06 by Jeremy C. Reed | Files touched by this commit (1147)
Log message:
Over 1200 files touched but no revisions bumped :)

RECOMMENDED is removed. It becomes ABI_DEPENDS.

BUILDLINK_RECOMMENDED.foo becomes BUILDLINK_ABI_DEPENDS.foo.

BUILDLINK_DEPENDS.foo becomes BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.foo.

BUILDLINK_DEPENDS does not change.

IGNORE_RECOMMENDED (which defaulted to "no") becomes USE_ABI_DEPENDS
which defaults to "yes".

Added to obsolete.mk checking for IGNORE_RECOMMENDED.

I did not manually go through and fix any aesthetic tab/spacing issues.

I have tested the above patch on DragonFly building and packaging
subversion and pkglint and their many dependencies.

I have also tested USE_ABI_DEPENDS=no on my NetBSD workstation (where I
have used IGNORE_RECOMMENDED for a long time). I have been an active user
of IGNORE_RECOMMENDED since it was available.

As suggested, I removed the documentation sentences suggesting bumping for
"security" issues.

As discussed on tech-pkg.

I will commit to revbump, pkglint, pkg_install, createbuildlink separately.

Note that if you use wip, it will fail!  I will commit to pkgsrc-wip
later (within day).
   2006-03-04 22:31:14 by Johnny C. Lam | Files touched by this commit (2257)
Log message:
Point MAINTAINER to pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org in the case where no
developer is officially maintaining the package.

The rationale for changing this from "tech-pkg" to \ 
"pkgsrc-users" is
that it implies that any user can try to maintain the package (by
submitting patches to the mailing list).  Since the folks most likely
to care about the package are the folks that want to use it or are
already using it, this would leverage the energy of users who aren't
developers.

Next | Query returned 34 messages, browsing 11 to 20 | Previous