Next | Query returned 18 messages, browsing 1 to 10 | Previous

History of commit frequency

CVS Commit History:


   2011-03-06 17:02:58 by Thomas Klausner | Files touched by this commit (393) | Package removed
Log message:
Remove GTK1 using packages for which noone spoke up for the last two weeks
on pkgsrc-users in the thread "[HEADS UP] Package removal -- please check".
   2011-01-13 14:40:12 by Thomas Klausner | Files touched by this commit (1644)
Log message:
png shlib name changed for png>=1.5.0, so bump PKGREVISIONs.
   2010-06-14 00:45:57 by Thomas Klausner | Files touched by this commit (1673)
Log message:
Bump PKGREVISION for libpng shlib name change.
Also add some patches to remove use of deprecated symbols and fix other
problems when looking for or compiling against libpng-1.4.x.
   2010-02-04 00:11:15 by Joerg Sonnenberger | Files touched by this commit (1)
Log message:
DESTDIR support
   2010-01-18 10:59:46 by Thomas Klausner | Files touched by this commit (938)
Log message:
Second try at jpeg-8 recursive PKGREVISION bump.
   2009-08-26 21:58:47 by Jens Rehsack | Files touched by this commit (1461) | Package updated
Log message:
bump revision because of graphics/jpeg update
   2007-01-29 11:31:48 by Joerg Sonnenberger | Files touched by this commit (1)
Log message:
Needs pkg-config.
   2006-10-04 23:44:47 by Thomas Klausner | Files touched by this commit (21)
Log message:
Update MASTER_SITES and/or HOMEPAGE, from Sergey Svishchev.
   2006-04-17 15:47:02 by Thomas Klausner | Files touched by this commit (1055) | Package updated
Log message:
Bump BUILDLINK_ABI_DEPENDS.png and PKGREVISION for png-1.2.9nb2 update.
   2006-03-04 22:31:14 by Johnny C. Lam | Files touched by this commit (2257)
Log message:
Point MAINTAINER to pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org in the case where no
developer is officially maintaining the package.

The rationale for changing this from "tech-pkg" to \ 
"pkgsrc-users" is
that it implies that any user can try to maintain the package (by
submitting patches to the mailing list).  Since the folks most likely
to care about the package are the folks that want to use it or are
already using it, this would leverage the energy of users who aren't
developers.

Next | Query returned 18 messages, browsing 1 to 10 | Previous